DOI: https://doi.org/10.22141/2224-1507.8.3.2018.144648

Use of somatosensory memory correction for the prevention of phantom pain after lower limb amputation

R.V. Vereskun, S.V. Petrosyants

Abstract


Background. Phantom pain syndrome (PPS) is one of the leading syndromes that complicates the postoperative period after limb amputation. Literature data indicate that it occurs in 30–35 % of the total number of patients with amputation; however, the causes are not exactly established. An important factor for PPS development is the constant pain impulses in the pre- and intraoperative period which, in turn, lead to the formation of a persistent pain in the postoperative period according to the concept of somatosensory me­mory. Aim: to determine the effectiveness of epidural catheter anesthesia for the prevention of phantom pain after lo­wer extremity amputation. Materials and methods. An ana­lysis was performed of the data in 38 patients who were on in-patient treatment at the Luhansk Regional Clinical Hospital in 2009–2014 and underwent lower limb amputation at different levels. All patients were divided into 2 groups (19 patients each), depending on the type of anesthesia. The control group consisted of patients who received general anesthesia. The main group of patients received treatment in accordance with the concept of somatosensory memory. Results. The results of this study prove that the treatment strategy which includes the concept of somatosensory memory allows reducing significantly the incidence, severity and duration of PPS in patients after lower limb amputation. Conclusions. The me­thod of epidural catheter anesthesia in pre- and intraoperative periods can be recommended for the prevention of phantom pain syndrome after lower limb amputation and requires wider use in Ukraine.


Keywords


amputation; phantom pain syndrome; prevention; somatosensory memory; epidural catheter anesthesia

References


Pinchuk OI, Konovalenko SO. Phantom pain is one of the major problems of postponed amputation. Nursing. 2017;(4):42-44. (in Ukrainian).

Ershova IB, Ivanov AS, Shalimov SA, et al. A phantom pain syndrome - a real problem facing the person with the amputated extremity. Tavricheskiy mediko-biologicheskiy vestnik. 2012;15(3-2):97-99. (in Russan).

Ivanov AS, Shalimov SA, Prihoda DV, Skida IA, Ankudinov SS, Galuzinsky DE. Рathogenesis of phantom pain - the first step to understanding of problem. Zagal'na patologia ta patologicna fiziologia. 2011;6(4):18-23. (in Russan).

Ivanov AS. Prevention of phantom pain using the concept of somatosensory memory. Hyst: the ukrainian student medical journal. 2012;(14):251. (in Ukrainian).

Ovechkin AM, Kukushkin ML, Gnezdilov AV, Reshetniak VK. Adequacy of periamputic anesthesia as a factor preventing the inclusion of pain memory in the genesis of phantom pain syndrome. Anesteziologiya i Reanimatologiya. 1995;(2):56-59. (in Russan).

Fieldsen D, Wood S. Dealing with phantom limb pain after amputation. Nurs Times. 2011 Jan 11-17;107(1):21-3.

Shabalov VA, Isagulyan ED. Neuromodulation - the modern methods of pain surgery. Pacific Medical Journal. 2008;(1):16-21. (in Russan).

Cherkes-Zade DI, Kamenev IuF. Khirurgiia stopy [Foot Surgery]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Meditsina; 2002. 328 p. (in Russan).

Rasulić L, Ivanović S, Bascarević V, Simić V. Phantom pain and posttravmatic pain condition. Acta Chir Iugosl. 2004;51(4):71-80. (in Serbian).

Manchikanti L, Singh V. Managing phantom pain. Pain Physician. 2004 Jul;7(3):365-75.

Bosmans JC, Geertzen JH, Post WJ, van der Schans CP, Dijkstra PU. Factors associated wich phantom limb pain: a 31/2 year prospective study. Clin Rehabil. 2010 May;24(5):444-53. doi: 10.1177/0269215509360645.

Osipova GA, Abramov YuB, Efimova NV, Rybakova LV, Sergienko SI. An objective assessment of the analgesic effect of fentanyl and some factors affecting the effectiveness of analgesic. Anesteziologiya i Reanimatologiya. 1984;(2):44-48. (in Russan).

Duplenko IuK, Chebotarev DF. Starenie: Ocherki razvitiia problemy [Aging: Essays on the development of the problem]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka; 1985. 192 p. (in Russan).

Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S240-52. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543.




Copyright (c) 2018 PAIN. JOINTS. SPINE

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

© Publishing House Zaslavsky, 1997-2018

 

   Seo анализ сайта